| |
|
Key Position
Statements
Public Policy
Library
AST
Employee Leave &
Organ Donation Program
AST
Newsletter Articles
AST Homepage
WASHINGTON
REPRESENTATIVE:
Bill Applegate
Director of
Government Relations
Armstrong Teasdale LLP
1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006-4604
P: 202- 454-2864
F: 202- 393-0363
wapplegate@armstrongteasdale.com
American Society
of Transplantation
17000 Commerce Pkwy.
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
P: 856-439-9986
F: 856-439-9982
ast@ahint.com
|
| |
PUBLIC
POLICY LIBRARY |
| |
|
Recommendations for the United
Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) point system for donor kidney
allocation
To: Margaret D. Allen, MD - President,
UNOS
From: Thomas A Gonwa, MD, FACP - President, ASTP
Date: October 17, 1994
Date posted on the Web: July 25,
1996
Dear Dr. Allen:
The American Society of Transplant
Physicians Scientific Studies Committee has evaluated the U.N.O.S.
point system for donor kidney allocation. Their findings have
been presented to the Executive Committee of the A.S.T.P. who
wishes to make the following recommendations to U.N.O.S. point
system.
The recommendations are as follows:
- The system should be altered
to alleviate inequities of the current system of cadaveric
donor kidney allocation;
- The altered point system for
kidney allocation should be implemented as a single policy
nationwide and managed at the local level;
- Extra points should not be assigned
on a racial basis;
- More emphasis should be placed
on waiting time. The current system provides one point for
the patient with the longest waiting time and 1/2 point for
each year on the waiting fist. This issue is very important
to balance between the ethical principals of medical utility
and justice. A new system is recommended whereby each month
of waiting time constitutes 0.1.;
- Eliminate points for the categories
with poor matches because they are associated with actually
lower ten year survivals then the overall group of transplant
recipients. Thus, the following match category should be
deleted from the point system.
- 0 AB mismatch
- 3 BDR mismatch
- O ABOR mismatch category should
be maintained as a mandatory share category. Before this
is implemented careful study must take place to make sure
that this is not further result in inequities of organ allocation
to minority recipients.
- The concept that permissible
HLA mismatching criteria based on donor recipient sharing
of CREGs and critical amino acid residues needs further study.
This is promising and might lead to more equitable distributor
of organs to minority recipients. The A.S.T.P. believes that
this concept should be studied in depth to determine if it
could improve organ allocation.
- A similar concept of permissible
HLA mismatch categories which insures optimal graft survivals
and equitable organ allocation for all racial groups of transplant
patients also deserves further study.
The A.S.T.P. Scientific Studies
Committee is willing to participate in the formulation of a
list of CREGs, the development of criteria for permissible
HLA mismatching and their implementation in the U.N.O.S. point
system for organ allocation. Please feel free to contact myself
or Dr. Rene Duquesnoy, Chairman of the A.S.T.P. Scientific
Studies Committee for further information. Dr. Duquesnoy's
address is Univ of Pittsburgh Med. Ctr., Biomedical Science
Tower, Rm W1552, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, and his telephone number
is 412/624-1075.
Sincerely yours,
THOMAS A. GONWA, M.D., F.A.C.P.,
President
TAG/eg
cc: Douglas J. Norman, MD, President-Elect
Leslie Miller, MD, Secretary/Treasurer
Rene J. Duquesnoy, PhD
Back to top
Return to Public
Policy Library menu
|
|