HHS
Secretary Donna E. Shalala today announced several new initiatives
to further strengthen protections of human research subjects
in clinical trials, including those involving gene transfer.
The department's actions are designed to heighten government
oversight of biomedical research and to reinforce to research
institutions their responsibility to oversee their clinical
researchers and institutional review boards (IRBs). "In
the last few years, we've seen dramatic advances in the effort
to find new therapies for cancer and other diseases, and we've
taken new steps to protect the safety of patients in clinical
trials," Secretary Shalala said. "But the explosion
in biomedical research has also brought new challenges, as
more researchers are becoming involved in commercial ventures
that may create new ethical dilemmas. Today's actions are designed
to further strengthen government oversight of all biomedical
research, including gene transfer research, and to reinforce
institutions' and researchers' responsibility to follow internationally
accepted ethical standards and federal guidelines."
The
actions taken by HHS today focus on expanding education
and training for all clinical investigators and IRB members
and staff; enhancing the informed consent process and ensuring
more vigilant monitoring and oversight; ensuring that researchers
understand and comply with federal conflict of interest
regulations; and pursuing efforts to provide the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) with additional enforcement tools
to enhance its oversight role. They also respond to a request
from President Clinton to examine ways to ensure patient
safety and increase public confidence in clinical trials.
Secretary
Shalala also stressed the responsibility of the leaders
of universities and academic medical centers to oversee
IRBs. "Recent reports of problems in gene transfer
trials have highlighted the new pressures facing researchers,
IRBs, and research institutions themselves," she said. "Protecting
patient safety, and ensuring informed consent, is a shared
responsibility. I want to urge university presidents, leaders
of our academic medical centers, and others involved in
biomedical research to take a hard look at oversight of
clinical trials, their partnerships with the private sector,
their own ethical guidelines, and the support and guidance
they give their IRBs. Public confidence in clinical trials
is essential to the continued advances in medicine we all
hope to see in the next century." "We must ensure
that patients are well protected and properly informed
when they choose to enroll in a clinical trial," said
FDA Commissioner Jane E. Henney, M.D. "By maintaining
high standards and requiring that all investigators adhere
to them, we can be sure that the nation's biomedical research
enterprise will continue to earn the trust of research
subjects." "We are constantly exploring new and
effective ways to enhance systems to strengthen protections
for human research subjects without unduly burdening IRBs," added
Ruth Kirschstein, M.D., acting director of the National
Institutes of Health (NIH). "These new initiatives
should significantly improve communication among researchers,
patients and the IRBs."
Today's
announcements address the following issues:
Education
and Training. HHS will undertake an aggressive effort to
improve the education and training of clinical investigators,
IRB members, and associated IRB and institutional staff.
NIH, FDA and the Office for Protection from Research Risks
(OPRR) will work closely together to ensure that all clinical
investigators, research administrators, IRB members and
IRB staff receive appropriate research bioethics training
and human subjects research training. Such training will
be a requirement of all clinical investigators receiving
NIH funds and will be a condition of the NIH grant award
process and of the OPRR assurance process. Informed Consent.
NIH and FDA will issue specific guidance on informed consent,
clarifying that research institutions and sponsors are
expected to audit records for evidence of compliance with
informed consent requirements. For particularly risky or
complex clinical trials, IRBs will be expected to take
additional measures, which, for example, could include
third-party observation of the informed consent process.
The guidance will also reassert the obligation of investigators
to reconfirm informed consent of participants upon the
occurrence of any significant trial-related event that
may affect a subject's willingness to participate in the
trial.
Improved
Monitoring. NIH will now require investigators conducting
smaller-scale early clinical trials (Phase I and Phase
II) to submit clinical trial monitoring plans to the NIH
at the time of grant application, and will expect investigators
to share these plans with IRBs.
The
NIH already requires investigators to have such plans and
they also require large scale (Phase III) trials to have
Data and Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMBs). For research
on medical products intended to be marketed, FDA will also
issue guidelines for DSMBs that will delineate the relationship
between DSMBs and IRBs, and define when DSMBs should be
required, when they should be independent, their responsibilities,
confidentiality issues, operational issues and qualified
membership. Conflict of Interest. NIH will issue additional
guidance to clarify its regulations regarding conflict
of interest, which will apply to all NIH-funded research.
HHS will also hold public discussions this summer to find
new ways to manage conflicts of interest so that research
subjects are appropriately informed, and to further ensure
that research results are analyzed and presented objectively.
In addition, these public discussions also will focus on
clarifying and enhancing the informed consent process.
Based on these public forums, NIH and FDA will work together
to develop new policies for the broader biomedical research
community, which will require, for example, that any researchers'
financial interest in a clinical trial be disclosed to
potential participants.
Civil
Monetary Penalties. HHS will pursue legislation to enable
FDA to levy civil monetary penalties for violations of
informed consent and other important research practices-up
to $250,000 per clinical investigator and up to $1 million
per research institution. While FDA can currently issue
warning letters or impose regulatory sanctions that halt
research until problems are rectified, financial penalties
will give the agency additional tools to sanction research
institutions, sponsors and researchers who do not follow
federal guidelines. As an interim step, NIH, OPRR and FDA
will work more closely together to enforce and target existing
penalties.
For
more than 50 years, HHS agencies have been committed to
protecting individuals from possible abuse or harm in clinical
trials and to ensuring that prospective and enrolled participants
understand the potential risks and benefits, if any, of
being a research subject. In 1972, OPRR was created as
part of NIH to ensure the safety and welfare of people
who participate in research sponsored by HHS. In 1981,
FDA followed up by revising its regulations to require
written informed consent in all studies of products that
FDA regulates. Today, FDA, NIH and OPRR continue to play
important and complementary roles in overseeing research
and protecting the human subjects involved. More resources
may be needed to fully implement these responsibilities
in the years ahead. These agencies work with IRBs to ensure
that people who agree to participate in studies fully understand
the nature of the research and willingly consent to participate.
This "informed consent" process requires that
potential participants be given an explanation of purposes
of the research, the expected duration of the subject's
participation, a description of the procedures to be followed
and their potential risks and benefits, and identification
of any procedures that are experimental. Research institutions
such as academic health centers and universities have the
ultimate responsibility to ensure that clinical investigators
adhere to this informed consent process.
Note:
For other HHS Press Releases and Fact Sheets pertaining
to the subject of this announcement, please visit our
Press Release and Fact Sheet search engine at: http://www.os.dhhs.gov/news/press/.