ASTP's response to rumored final
rule making for the OPTN by DHHS.
November 17, 1997
Date posted on the Web: November 26, 1997
Donna E. Shalala
Secretary
DHHS
615 F. Hubert H. Humphrey Bldg.
200 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20201
Dear Madam Secretary:
I write as president of and on behalf
of the American Society of Transplant Physicians (ASTP) about
the regulations rumored to be forthcoming from your department
that address organ procurement and allocation policies. The
ASTP is the largest professional transplant society in the
US, with broad representation from over 1200 physicians, surgeons,
and scientists. The ASTP and its members are involved in the
practice of transplantation, research education of peers and
education of the American people about tissue and organ transplantation.
Rumors have suggested
your department will soon release "final" regulations
with features that could be unwise, unsound, contentious and
perhaps in opposition
to the purposes and the wisdom of the Congress as expressed
in the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) of 1984. If these
rumors prove true, the ASTP fears the release of final regulations
without opportunity for public comment, would be unwise and
potentially create wide-spread dissension and opposition within
the transplant community. There has been little opportunity
to publicly comment on the last draft of regulations placed
on the table three years ago, let alone an opportunity to scrutinize
proposed language rumored to represent wholesale changes in
substance and tone of the previous draft, as well as new regulatory
schemes not previously disclosed.
Madam Secretary, the ASTP has formally
supported the promulgation of final regulations governing the
function of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network as established
by NOTA and of the relationship of the OPTN with the government
in its White Paper review of organ transplantation (which I
enclose), however, we feel that these regulations should provide
regulatory oversight and enforcement mechanisms to support
policies developed by the painstaking practice of evidence-based
decision making and consensus building developed by the transplant
community. The ASTP strongly supports the concept that decisions
concerning organ transplant policy must be based on evidence.
Toward that end
our society has sponsored "consensus" conferences
and published peer-reviewed literature on allocation, uniform
listing criteria, donor and
recipient evaluation, and transplant ethics all designed to
create a superstructure for decisions that provide maximal
equity and utility. Working with sister societies such as the
American Society of Transplant Surgeons, The National Institutes
of Health, and the Institute of Medicine, we have provided
data that has helped the Organ Procurement Transplant Network
( OPTN) develop policy consensus even in the such highly contentious
arena as liver organ allocation. It is this process which should
be supported, rather than one in which decisions about organ
allocation and patient listing are made primarily at the Department
removing the basic principle of evidence based decision making
and opening these matters to the vagaries of politics, bureaucracy,
and lobbying.
The ASTP strongly supports both
the oversight function of the Department in transplant matters
and the wisdom of the Congress as expressed in NOTA to place
the policy decisions about allocation and listing in the private
sector with patients, donor family members, scientists, physicians,
surgeons, ethicists, histocompatability experts and organ procurement
experts all working together to provide policy based on data
and balancing equity and utility.
The ASTP commends your efforts,
Madam Secretary, and those of your Department to enhance organ
retrieval to address the acute and tragic donor shortage driving
many of the difficult issues in transplantation. I trust that
the transplant community, certainly the ASTP, can work as strong
partners with the Department to provide a chance for new or
more productive life to many of our countrymen in a fair, equitable
manner with full support and confidence of the American people.
We must work together, not at cross purposes or in an adversarial
manner. The ASTP hopes that draft language of contemplated
regulations are released shortly and released for comment so
we and others in the transplant community can work with the
Department toward establishing policies which maximize the
benefits of transplantation in our land.
Thank you for your consideration.
The ASTP stands ready to help you in your deliberations on
this or any other transplant matter, and we look forward to
your response to the above stated concerns.
Sincerely,
J. Harold Helderman, MD
President